Bits and Pieces

There are various news stories out there that give us a real look in the mirror and bits and pieces is my attempt to summarize some of my favorite for your reading pleasure:

  • Iraq and Afghanistan – Several stories have appeared recently documenting that in Iraq, there is still seething ethnic rivalries and resentment at the American occupation.  Baghdad is basically a segregated community where many Sunnis have not moved back.  In Afghanistan, similar dislike of the American occupation is being recorded and with the infusion of another 30,000 American troops, al-Qaeda and the Taliban are gearing up for heated battles.  Does it ever occur to anyone that maybe more troops is the problem?  What if they had a battle and no one came?  One thing we are learning is that military action is expensive.  So where does the Taliban and al-Qaeda get their dough?  If nobody cared would there be a problem anymore?  Maybe it is time for them to solve their own problems.
  • The Washington Post on Sunday ran a front page story that basically told that the CIA’s first high value detainee, Abu Zabaida, which they tortured, and which Cheney and Bush lauded as a great source of information to justify their torture policies, gave no reliable information.  Well that is not quite true.  He gave some very reliable information before they started torturing him, but the reality was that he was not a kingpin in al-Qaeda as Bush and Cheney claimed.  This comes as no surprise to anyone who has read The Dark Side by Jane Mayer who last year pretty much totally chronicled the keystone cops approach to interrogation that the CIA applied, the torture that led to nowhere, and the murders and brutality committed in our names that was totally unproductive.  Jane couldn’t name sources, but apparently now they are willing to tell their tale so the major news organizations are picking it up.  Welcome America to a story that will make you sick to your stomach.
  • In a related story, Spain may indict some of the Bush Administration officials for war crimes in their part in promoting torture.  It is a very sad day when we have to look to Spain to uphold the law that the United States used to stand for.  If the Obama Administration does not investigate our war crimes as required by our treaties and leaves it to other countries, it will further decay our moral standing in the world if not our morals themselves.  Why is this so hard?
  • Meanwhile in Cambodia, they have started their first trial on the torture and killing that occurred at Tuol Sleng prison where at least 14,000 people were tortured before being executed during the reign of the Khmer Rouge.  And what is the chief warden’s defense.  I was just following orders and they would have killed me and my family if I did not comply.  It will be the same defense that will be heard in the U.S. if we prosecute those who partook in torture.  Sooner or later we have to establish that following orders is not a defense against these crimes against humanity.  Oh, I forgot.  We already did that at Nuremberg after World War II.  You think we could remember that.
  • In North Korea, two American female journalists may face trails for entering the country illegally.  With the North Koreans, there is probably no basis to the charges.  The connection I see is the missile launch this month.  In the warped North Korean mind, it may seem logical to have a couple of American hostages in case we try to shoot down or prevent their missile launch.  If the launch occurs without incident, the situation with these two will probably clear up.  Hopefully.
  • President Obama made another trip to Congress this week, this time in the House, to encourage Democrats to support his budget.  Some Democrats (Conseradems as Rachel Maddow calls them) in the Senate are playing right into the Republican’s hands with their idea to force many votes that would be subject to the filibuster.  Let’s get back to majority rule instead of minority rule so we can get something done.  If you are afraid we are being too aggressive, just think back to the last eight years and ask yourself we could do more harm than that.  It is time to try something new and that is what this budget is about.
  • President Obama moved aggressively to reject the automakers plan, asked for CEO resignations, and set a deadline for real action.  Republicans are screaming government intervention and others are saying that the CEO should have stayed on.  Just remember the cardinal rule:  When the strategy must change, you need new generals.  Old thinking won’t get us there and that applies both to Republicans in general, and CEO’s specifically.  We don’t need to fight last years wars all over again.
  • Simon Johnston and Paul Krugman, both economists, have noted something we all ought to be thinking about:  Restoring the financial markets to business as usual is just setting us up for failure once again.  Packaging and selling debt is not the growth industry of the future and financial institutions can never again be too big to fail.  There are major implications of these ideas in the regulations that must come out of this debacle and in the mindset of Wall Street.  You can bet the vested interests will fight this every step of the way and is why change and progress are so hard.  The pockets of both Democrats and Republicans is lined with Wall Street Money.
  • In the debate to overhaul health care, many are arguing that a government program similar to Medicare competing with private insurers would be unfair.  But I have come up with a way to level the playing field.  All government programs would have to charge a 30% surcharge so that the administration costs of the private insurers trying to either deny claims or skim healthy members would be competitive.  Then every one would have the same inefficient systems.
  • Our prisons are full and overflowing, and more importantly for most politicians that used “throw the key away” rhetoric to get elected, the costs are now swamping our state governments.  We have the largest incarcerated population in the world with 1 in 10 Americans having been incarcerated.  Why does it take the all mighty dollar for politicians to finely recognize that many in prison don’t belong there and to start doing the right thing?
  • Last but not least is that there seems to be a bipartisan movement in the Senate to finally relieve the restrictions on travel and trade with Cuba.  Most now see our economic and travel restrictions there have been an abject failure.  But we still have diehards such as Senator Menendez, Democrat from New Jersey, who see this as rewarding their bad behavior.  Let’s see.  The policy has been totally unsuccessful, but to change it would be to reward them?  Is this not the definition of inflexibility and stupidity?  Reminds me of the Republicans and their continued campaign of denying global warming.  Those melting ice caps and the new studies by the majority of scientists that show the phenomenon accelerating are just liberal tactics to destroy the economy.  See any connection between this kind of thinking and the failure of the auto industry to adapt to change?

You know, it is sad when you can see the way forward but you just can’t get the rest of the country to move in your direction.  Whether it is health care, global warming, energy policy, torture investigations, our prison systems, or Cuba restrictions, why is it so hard to do the reasonable thing?

Leave a comment