Bipartisanship
In case you haven’t figured it out, when conservative Republicans say they want bipartisanship they mean their way or your being partisan. Democrats by their very nature want to find common ground and work (most of the time) to try to accommodate the other side. The other side simply sees this as weakness and that is why they despise the Democrats. See Democrats are immoral because they don’t stand up for their beliefs. They give an inch and that is immoral.
Watching the negotiations on the economic bailout has been most instructive about these Republicans. The Democrats (and to his credit, John McCain) laid out some basic guidelines. In “negotiation speak” this is called the interests of the parties. If you can establish each side’s real interests, instead of trying to negotiate hard terms first, you may be able to reach agreement by defining the terms of the agreement to satisfy those interests. The trouble is there is a whole group of Republican conservatives in the House whose interest is to not have an agreement. In their mind government has no role to play. They presented a counter plan unknown to the negotiators to have private interests buy the bad paper with government insurance. This is kind of like lobbing a grenade into peace negotiations. I have not seen this plan in detail but if my initial assessment of the plan is correct, it simply allows the private sector to once again get rich if the economy comes back and if not, still leaves the tax payers holding the bag in the form of insurance. As a taxpayer I think I would rather have an interest in this thing so if there is money to be made, the government and by extension we taxpayers, will benefit.
This whole thing started when businesses started to fail due to liquidity problems, credit started to dry up according to our government, and strong action was called for to keep the whole market from collapsing. Now conservative Republicans are questioning this premise. Some economists are arguing that the market must be left to self-correct. Others are telling us to take action fast or the consequences could be far worse than the bitter medicine they are prescribing. So whom do you believe? Seen any responsible economists being interviewed on the cable news media? Me either, but that is the nature of our media; they will focus more on the political implications of the issue than informing us on the economic basis for the plan. But I digress.
Right now these conservative Republicans are working a populist agenda that is angry at Wall Street, and do not want to pay the bill for these evil doers while they (the populists) are suffering in the hinterlands. It’s a lynch mob mentality. So they will stand up for these folks even if the economy collapses. Dogma is far more important than reality. The bottom line is that these are people who brought you this disaster. It is the same belief that government should stay out of the private sector that lead to this debacle. Consider this: Do you think those evil doer Wall Street Bankers are Democrats or Republicans? It is their philosophy carried to its logical conclusion that has caused this crisis, and now it is their philosophy that will stymie any attempt to solve the problem by government.
Here is what I think: Go ahead with the deal. The paper we are buying does have value and if we can, in the next couple of years, get the economy back on track, we could actually recoup most of our investment. The deal must allow the terms of the agreements to be managed to limit defaults. Eventually these home prices will return and it is far less costly in the short term to reduce the mortgage payments, and by extension the return on investment on these agreements, than to foreclose, throw people out of their homes, and worsen our domestic economy. Get over the punishment thing. Right now we need to focus on saving the economy for all of us. Typical of good conservative Republicans, driven by a system of obedience to authority and punishment, punishment is the first thing on their mind. It is the most counter productive action we could take right now. Some will benefit who don’t deserve to. Get over it; life is not fair, but we need to do the right thing for the whole society, not focus on punishment for a few. Democrats should not have to carry this water alone and Republicans need to support this bailout (with appropriate modifications) so that the nation can move forward in unison. If they don’t, it won’t work.
Here are some things to think about:
• John McCain parachuted into this fray without any power to do anything, disliked by conservative Republicans, and without the economic intellectual capital to lead anyone to a solution. It was pure politics in its worst form and was hurtful to the process. So much for America First
• Conservative Republicans do not believe, as demonstrated in this economic debate, in working in a bipartisan manner and never will. This does not bode well for a country that is moving toward seeing the government as part of the solution as reflected in most polls
• I don’t know whether this solution will work or not, but I think the chance that the economy will fail is not worth taking. Carefully crafted, we might even benefit in the long run
• As long as we keep electing fundamentalist conservative Republicans this country is going nowhere. There is no hope for healthcare reform, energy investment, or rebuilding our infrastructure because their basic “religious” faith in the conservative Republican philosophy will not allow them to allow government to take a leading role
So if you really are unhappy with the direction of this country and you want to see government work togehter, maybe you ought to look at your own voting record. Maybe you are the problem.
Peter Quinn:
Hi. I am a long time reader. I wanted to say that I like your blog and the layout.
Peter Quinn
September 26, 2008, 9:59 amslightner:
Thanks Peter, I appreciate all the encouragement I can get.
September 26, 2008, 10:22 amAlice Nunnery:
I heard someone on CNN comment this morning that McCain is painting himself into a corner with paint that may never dry. He’ll be stuck there, and if he is president, he’ll have no one in Congress to work with, having made the Democrats and both factions of his own party furious with his impulsive political misdirections. “Deregulate! No, wait, I mean we need to Regulate!”
Has anyone seen those big flip-flops that people were waving at John Kerry four years ago? Seems like a good time to drag them out again.
September 26, 2008, 2:37 pmAlice Nunnery:
My previous comment was a bit flip, I’m afraid. I think you are absolutely right about not focusing so much on punishment for the perpetrators of all of this. More than anything else, we need a bipartisan, non-punitive solution which makes the taxpayers investors; i.e. we don’t “bail out” these failing banks and companies; rather, we give them high-interest loans so that we get some return on our money as they are working to pay us back. Also, we make sure there is sufficient Congressional oversight–read that “regulation”–to insure that such shenanigans are curtailed in the future. I’m hoping that McCain and Obama will be asked in tonight’s debate (so good of McCain to show up–flip-flop) to articulate clearly their plans for proceeding after this deal is worked out.
September 26, 2008, 3:24 pm